Skip to main content

Who is censoring your information?

By August 3, 2014March 2nd, 2015mindfield, wisdom

Are you aware that someone is censoring your incoming mail?

Okay, itā€™s not your mail exactly. Itā€™s all of theĀ information you receive. Someone is tampering with it, and youā€™ll be surprised who it is.

The culprit is you. Or more precisely: your brain.

Your human brain is constantly filtering out useless information. What kind of information is ā€œuselessā€? Well, that depends on how your brain has been programmed.

If you grew up in a community of religious fundamentalists youā€™ll filter out opposing messages that challenge the tenets of that religion. Thatā€™s a ā€œworldview filter.ā€

Information thatā€™s inconsistent with (or that challenges) your worldview is ā€œuselessā€ according to your brainā€™s programming. And thatā€™s a scientific fact

Hopefully your worldview doesnā€™t filter out scientific facts. If not, read onā€¦

Your brain uses a lot of oxygen, and consumes a lot of your bodyā€™s energy resources. But your brain is efficient. And its efficiency applies to information gathering.

Most information it receives is irrelevant. And so prioritizing the inputs it receives is crucial.

The brain censors ā€œuselessā€ information to makes sure you can make important simple decisions like: where can I get my next meal?

And this makes perfect sense right? The alternative is probably not efficient.

For example, what if your brain wallowed in decisionsĀ like this: hmmm, I wonder if my worldview is not based on reality thatā€™s confirmable by science?

No one wants to get bogged down with questions like that. Your worldview filter is set in stone, and maybe that’s fine. But your brainā€™s worldview filter is only one of many filters that it employs.

Your brain might have a few secret filters, ones that keep you from learning useful things. I recently discovered thatĀ my brain had a problem filter.

My brain had a the-message-is-useless-because-the-messenger-is-a-jerk filter. Let me explain how this filterĀ workedā€¦

Several years ago I read a book called Four Hour Work Week, by Tim Ferriss. I was intrigued, and wanted to make use of hisĀ bold ideas.

But then I read someĀ bloggers saying heĀ was sort of a jerk. They painted FerrissĀ as overly confident and too self-promotional. Yeah, I could see that too: he was probably a jerk.

My brain then ignored all the information it receivedĀ from Ferrissā€™s book. I have been trained to trust thatĀ brain always has my best interests in mind, so I didn’t even notice the filter kicking in. My brain solved the “useless information problem” in the background.

Now itĀ was free to focus onĀ pedestrian, but important, decisions. Likeā€¦

Whatā€™s for lunch?

[Flash forward a few years, to the present]

The other dayĀ my friend Craig Bayer recommended I listen to Tim Ferrissā€™ podcast. But my brain reminded meĀ that Ferriss was a jerk. ThenĀ my brain directed me to mention this to Craig.

Craig replied thatĀ he didnā€™t know whether Ferriss was a jerk.Ā HeĀ emphasizedĀ that the podcasts hadĀ some great guests with interesting ideas. I shrugged my shouldersĀ while my brain struggledĀ to apply itsĀ jerk-filter.

This timeĀ theĀ jerk-filter failed to kick in.Ā I listened to aĀ Ferriss podcast episode with guest Josh Waitzkin, the subject of the movie Searching for Bobby Fisher,Ā which was about aĀ chess prodigy from New York City.

I already knew that Waitzkin mastered chess at a very young age. But by listening to the podcast I learned that WaitzkinĀ mastered many other things besides chess: including Tai Chi Chuan. I was intrigued.

I discovered that Waitzin is intensely curious about how to improve in the most efficient way. Obviously his brain is good at learning complex skills, both intellectual and physical. In fact, it turns out Waitzkin hasĀ written a book called The Art of Learning: An Inner Journey to Optimal Performance.

Josh Waitzin, clearly isnā€™t a jerk. So, nowĀ I’m wondering if his book contains useful information that I should explore.

And now my brain has to deal with potentially useful new information ā€”if I can change a few habitualĀ thought patterns.

Of course,Ā changing thought patternsĀ is hard.Ā Not really what my brain craves. My brain likes things to routine and easy.

Speaking of whichā€¦

Whatā€™s for lunch?


Learn how to completely transform your practice with the Smart Lawyers Tech Guide.
Skip to content