Skip to main content

Why is my email broken?

By October 26, 2009Uncategorized

Almost everyone I know who uses email extensively for work is overwhelmed by email.  People used to talk about achieving 'in-box zero,' that triumphant (yet fleeting) moment when you go through your email inbox and process all email.  Processing email means: responding to it, forwarding it, filing it, or deleting it.  

In the old days, you could quickly go through your email inbox and delete a lot of stuff and be left with just a few things to respond to or otherwise deal with in some meaningful way.  Those days are long gone. I routinely hear people (smart, well-organized, tech-savvy people) say that they've given up on achieving 'in-box zero.'  Some people declare 'email bankruptcy,' which means that they delete all the emails in their inbox and then start from scratch.  And these are the optimists!

The pessimists have declared that they are giving up on email altogether, often opting to simply use Twitter and the phone.  Their strategy is this: communicate en masse to their Twitter followers, and DM ('direct message') those that they want to talk to directly.  And anyone else that they want to communicate with (i.e. those who don't use Twitter) they'll talk to by phone. This seems harsh, but it's even harsher when you consider that 'communicating by Twitter' means using 140 characters or less to send messages.

I am not yet a 'pessimist,' and I haven't yet declared email bankruptcy.  But I do think that email is 'broken.' Why?

Well, for starters, there are simply too many messages in my inbox to deal with everyday.  I could take up at least 30 minutes each day just deleting emails.  Filing them would add another hour to the day.  The real problem are the emails that I have to respond to.  I get at least 30 emails that require some serious response, and probably another 40 or so from people who EXPECT a response even though I can't help them, or can't help them at the time their response comes in. 

In short, I am constrained to simply not respond to a number of emails.  This makes me very uncomfortable, but I just don't have time to answer.  And even if I did, for many of these emails a response would simply generate another email back from the person with a follow up suggestion or question. 

So, if you email me and I don't respond it's not because I don't care.  It's because I have finite resources and my email situation is totally broken. If you're happy with your email situation then you are truly fortunate.  I envy you completely.  

For me, email is more burdensome than helpful. And I expect things to get worse.


P.S. If you appreciate these kinds of observations, you might want to read this as well.

5 Comments

  • You may find the following interesting:

    https://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2008/01/09/10-steps-to-become-an-email-ninja/

    Essentially, I’ve heard people have ‘autoresponse’ email replies generated notifying the sender that you only respond to emails from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m., or some other block of time.

    I believe this idea sets a realistic expectation on the part of your client or co-workers.

    Robert

  • Many institutions limit access to their online information. Making this information available will be an asset to all.

  • John Martin says:

    Hi Ernie,

    I had thought a couple of years ago that one could take Thunderbird (OSS – Mac / *nix / Windows) source code and modify it to store messages in a mbox format on a per conversation basis. Effectively you would have a message ingester take each message arriving and remove all information from the body that had previously appeared in the conversation (reply with previous message / signature blocks / disclaimer footers / etc.) and then update the mbox-message file with just the new header and unique information.

    The effect would be that each file conversation that appears in your mailbox would “bounce” back to the top of your email with an unread value each and every time a new reply to an existing conversation. It would show attachments in the body of the conversation mbox-file when they appeared in chronological order. It would also eliminate the concept of having a separate “Sent” / “Inbox” since your messages are merged into the conversation mbox-file along with the ones you receive. Instead you could have client/matter folders, job folders or whatever labels make since to you. This makes archiving a project or matter very simple.

    I only got as far as alpha testing the technologies involved, but it reduced my mail storage from 2GB to 322MB and from 6,786 messages to less than 500 conversations.

    My $0.02,

    John

  • Shannon Phillips says:

    You broke the cardinal rule. Don’t complain about something without offering a solution that you think is workable. You mention using Twitter/Phone or going into email bankruptcy, but you don’t offer either of those as solutions. What’s your proposed solution?

  • Laurie says:

    Personally, I have little difficulty keeping up with my email, but maybe I’m just not as busy!!

    I do recommend though that business owners in such a situation delegate some email duties. If you find someone you can trust to work with you – it can mean you don’t ignore important emails or contacts and yet you don’t waste half your day on email!

Skip to content